The Meme Ocean and the Art of Zen Retweeting
Today, I get to play Devil’s Advocate. Today the quite brilliant, smashing, blunt, and brazen ladies of Outspoken Media declared “the suck” on Twitter’s new RT feature. After reading it, I don’t disagree with it in principal. It would definitely suck to have a great night of good times, think you went to bed alone, and wake up next to some chico/chica.
But, now with the ass-kissing and link-dropping out of the way, let’s move into the position. While the new Retweet feature can be a bit invasive, it’s only because we all see ourselves as a “stream” of meme. That this stream, like other tributaries, are encapsulated and flow into a larger system.
While this is not entirely incorrect, it’s conceptual and subjective stance to see yourself as a stream. One could choose to think of themselves as a meme ocean. After all, what are tweets but 140 character memes dispersed in a finite system, connected to other finite systems.
The true genius behind the RT feature is that it tries to capture this Ocean Meme subjectivity. With Traditional RT’ing, you can stretch a meme only so far. Now the entirety of Twitter is an ocean. It’s a movement away from the individualized stream into an almost super-conscious of meme threads and Zen Retweeting. But this only a surface level issue, and a little philosophical to explore without another post. So let’s leave it at that.
The Point / Counterpoint:
However, I still have followers who will try out the new way and insert possible muggers, thieves and puppy killers into my stream. Twitter has now left me in a really uncomfortable position – let the strangers in and give up the sanctity of my network or block retweets from people in my network. I don’t like how that feels. I don’t like any of this.
I think that’s a little bit of an exaggeration. And truthfully, I don’t like it either. However, I do like the fact that my ego-driven meme can be spread even farther now, reaching people it might not normally ever run across. As for the “strangers in your stream”, I tend to think it’s a good. If Twitter is to really be a community, the new RT functionality is certainly fostering that idea. Of course you’re going to get a fair share of worthlessness. Everyone’s going to get spammed, and get “weird faces”, but you’ve got to look past that.
The New RT: Death of Niche Communities
The great part about this is discovering those who you never would have discovered otherwise. The 3rd and 4th level connected followers. I admit, the odds definitely don’t favor it, but there’s always a diamond in the rough. This RT functionality does a lot to lift the veil on “niche communities” (i.e. the SEM community, the Celebrity community, or the Tech community). Straying into philosophical territory again, the new RT helps to show the inter-connectivity of system, the entire “no wo/man is an island” concept.
And, for a conflict-theorist subscriber, I always up for tearing down power-structures and leveling the playing field. Get ready for it: I’m about to call a spade a spade. The only people really, really, bitching about this new functionality are superstars of the Twitter community. Those with a relatively large following are obviously protective of their stream and followers. I don’t think this is Twitter’s way to spread the power equally, but it’s certainly to get some exposure to those just engaging the space. And, after all, isn’t that what each of us begs of followers (and ourselves): we care less about how you use the space, but that you engage it genuinely. This is a chance, an opportunity, to allow people to do that.
At the end of day, I’m on the side of giving Twitter a “Commendable Effort” award to help along the system as a whole get “more connected” and loosen the grip of niche-power-holdings within communities. You don’t have to use it, but open yourselves up to the possibility that you may find some great folks out there who can provide insight, reliable, and trustworthy information (even if they are strangers to your ocean memes).
ABC (Always Be Closing) Your SEM
The past couple weeks I’ve been thinking about how most groups, firms, and independents sell their SEM services. They are always talking about RESULTS. You see it in slides. You hear it as you walk past conference rooms:
“I’ve helped so-and-so double their website traffic in the last 6 months“, or “We’ve moved Client X to the first page of results for Keyword A and Keyword B“, and, finally, “We’ve increased lead generation and conversions 200% in the last year“.
The problem is simple. It’s something we’ve all known since high school physics: Newton’s 2nd Law of Motion: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction (i.e. the ripple). The way you’ve been selling your SEM is backwards; you’re expecting a reverse ripple of action.
The Traditional SEM Sell
Here’s how the majority have been selling search engine marketing services:
No, I’m not implying there is an issue with results-based selling. The issue arises when that’s all you’re selling. Phantom numbers. Mysterious statistics of success.
There’s no doubt that your prospective is more than likely impressed with the numbers. Probably even made a face at you too that went something like this: *Raises eyebrow* and *Eyes-Get-A-Bit-Wider* –> *Pensive Facial Grab* and *Leaning Forward*
Right. It’s that last part that should worry you. That last part is what you don’t want to see: THIS PERSON THINKS YOU’VE JUST BULLSHIT THEM.
They don’t really believe you made those results happen and/or you did it once, with one client, and probably haven’t repeated it since. That’s how far results-based selling will get you: just far enough to get a “thanks for your time” and “we’ll talk this over and get back to you”.
It’s a weak footprint to leave behind. Every other agency/firm/group is doing the exact same thing: blowing hot-air results. And, what that leaves the decision-maker with is a battle over price, personality, and brand-fashionista-ism.
Company X charges $$$, promised incredible results, very nice guys and seemed knowledgeable, but haven’t heard of them around town. Company Y charges $$, also promised great results, nice too, and I’ve heard the name before. Budgets are tight: Company Y it is.
This method expects RESULTS to produce ACTION. And, in some cases, this method can be to your advantage, but we know from living our lives that ACTION produces RESULTS. So, why would the opposite be true when your pitching SEM?
How You Actually Should Be Selling SEM
Here’s how you should be selling search engine marketing services:
Telling the prospective client what it is you do to produce results, is what sells your SEM services. Results, in any fashion, are always an aftershock, a ripple or after-effect, of any action. For better or worse.
Using this, in combination with a result, makes the logic simple to follow and the results tangible. You can imply the results are attainable and not just phantom numbers on a slide.
You make think this method leads to giving away the “secret sauce” and “demystifying” the SEM process, but it doesn’t. You don’t have to give intimate details away at the pitch, you present a 30,000 ft. view of the process, stratifying larger tasks. In a marketplace that most people already think is related to the “dark arts” or “snake oil salesman”, this is an instant route to earning trust with the prospect, and retaining leverage as the authority.
The only pitfall here is the tendency to overwhelm with process. And, while on occasion this can work to your advantage, especially with prospects that are familiar with search engine marketing, in the end it may dizzy them up and leave them action-less.
The next time you walk into a pitch sell using ACTIONS, what you WILL DO to improve their online efforts. Then tell them the results. ABC, people. Always Be Closing.










